I recently got an email from Family Tree Maker Magazine about GenealogyBank.com, a website that has old newspapers online. I saw they have a 30-day trial offer so I thought I'd try it. Boy did I find some interesting stuff within just a few hours! One of the papers they have archived is the Grand Forks Herald. As my LeFavor family lived in East Grand Forks, I hit upon several related articles.
I finally found the name and date of Emma LeFavor's husband. From the Grand Forks Herald, 18 Jul 1912:
"Licensed to wed-Marriage licenses were issued yesterday to Edward Schneible and Emma LeFavor, both of Grand Forks, and to Claude C. Merchandt and Miss Jessie Maud Holzheimer, both of Seattle. The former couple were married by Judge L. K. Hassel yesterday afternoon."
Even more interesting, and what was actually the first article I hit upon, was one of Fred stealing a horse from his father-in-law, Charlie LeFavor!
From the Grand Forks Herald, 23 Mar 1913:
"HORSE STEALING CASE DISMISSED
Fred Schneible was Arrested on that Charge Friday by Father-in-Law.
Lack of Evidence and Because LeFavor Changed His Mind About Prosecution, the Defendant was Released--Accused Man Attempted to Go to Canada but was Stopped by Chief of Police Sullivan.
The case of Charles LeFavor against his son-in-law, Fred Schnieble, who was charged with stealing and selling a horse belonging to Mr. LeFavor, was dismissed in court yesterday morning because of lack of evidence as Mr. LeFavor said that he had given permission to the young man to sell the animal.
Mr. Schneible was arrested on Friday by Chief of Police Sullivan on a warrant procured by William Derrick, another relative, at the instigation of LeFavor. But the latter changed his mind about prosecuting and stated in court that he gave the young man his consent to sell the horse.
The evidence showed that the horse was taken from the LeFavor farm Friday morning and sold to William Elliott for $75.
When the sale was discovered, Mr. LeFavor sent Derrick to town, and a warrant was sworn out by Judge William J. Rasmussen.
Chief of Police Sullivan kept on Schneible's trail all afternoon. Learning that the man intended leaving for Canada Friday night, he went to the Grand Forks Northern Pacific depot just before the flyer was due. Schneible was not in sight, however, but Mr. Sullivan waited until the train pulled in. He made a hurried search of the cars, and not finding his man, was just ready to leave, when he happened to think that Schnieble might be waiting near the Great Northern-Northern Pacific crossing near the city. Mr. Sullivan again boarded the train, and when he alighted at the crossing, he discovered Schnieble ready to get on.
As soon as Schnieble saw the policeman he broke into a run across the country, but was caught before he had gone very far. He was returned to this city, and yesterday morning was arraigned in municipal court before Municipal Judge Rasmussen.
It is said that Schnieble sent his wife to Grafton Friday morning, intending to join her there when he went through Friday night."
The final LeFavor article was also very interesting. Apparently Charlie was selling liquor. Now I've found two ancestors who got in trouble with the law for that.
From the Grand Forks Herald, 10 Sep 1922:
"Minnesota Point Man Arrested On Charge Of Having Liquor For Sale
Chief of Police Harry Gregg, on Saturday afternoon raided the residence of Charles LeFavor, 222 Forest avenue, Minnesota-Point, and said that he discovered a large quantity of "moonshine" whiskey, wine, mash and a number of empty bottles on the premises.
Mr. LeFavor was arrested on a charge of keeping and having liquor for sale and will be arraigned in the municipal court Monday morning. Pending the hearing he is being held in the city jail.
This case, it is understood, will be dealt with in accordance with the recently passed city ordinance drawn up for the purpose of giving the municipal authorities jurisdiction in actions that grow out of liquor charges."
All that was found in just one night. I can't wait to see what else I can find today!
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
Helen Brausen's Origins
Out of all my great-great-grandparents, there's only one I haven't been able to find the exact origin of, Maria Magdalena "Helen" (Krings) Brausen. What I know about her is little. I have various different birth dates for her, various places of birth. She was supposedly born in Butzheim which is where her husband is born. I have looked at the records for Butzheim/Nettesheim & never found her. The odd thing is, there are Krings there. In fact, the witnesses for her husband Peter's birth in 1842 were Heinrich Esser & Christian Krings!
Her marriage record doesn't help much, it just makes things more confusing. She and Peter were married 30 Apr 1873 in St. Martin's, Springfield, Dane, WI. It asks for & lists the residence & place of birth of the husband but not the wife. Frustrating. It the spot where witnesses are supposed to be listed, it's blank. Her parents are listed as John Caris & Elis Krings. Are these the witnesses listed in the wrong spot? Is that her mother & step-father? Was her mother unwed when she was born and that's why both are Krings? This record just creates more questions than answers.
Her death record lists her mother as Mary, with no father listed. Her obituary is odd in that it lists being survived by, "one brother and a step-brother, Frank Ruker of Wisconsin". Why does it list the step-brother & not the brother? I have never ever been able to find a Frank Ruker, trying all sorts of spelling variations. I have found other Krings families but never a link to them. Her obituary also mentions something puzzling, "She came to America 59 years ago and two years later made her home in Milwaukee, Wis. Having lived in Milwaukee for 14 years she came to Morrison county where she has lived since." Did she really live in Milwaukee? Is that a mistake and it was Dane county as that's where they married & had children.
There is something that gives weight to her having lived in Milwaukee. I found this in my grandma's pictures and comparing it to the Brausen family picture, I'm almost positive this is Peter & Helen, perhaps at the time of their marriage. If you click and look at the enlarged version you will see that it is stamped from a studio in Milwaukee. In all the years I've done genealogy, this is the closest mystery to me that I have never been able to find any more information on.
Note: The originals of both of these pictures are in my possession. They came in the boxes of photos from my grandma, Eva (Meyer) Janson. The top picture is a digital restoration I did quite a few years ago. The original is almost in two pieces right down the middle & has a lot of the picture worn off. If you see this picture anywhere, I'm the source of it. I've seen it used all over the internet (and in printed family reports) with no mention of where it came from or the fact that I'm the one that digitally restored it.
Labels:
Brausen,
Caris,
Dane County,
Krings,
Ruker
Thursday, July 7, 2011
A very useful site
I feel lucky to have ancestors that settled here in Minnesota. Both because I live here which makes it so much easier to do research and because there are so many good resources online. One I actually ran across in an issue of Family Tree Maker magazine is called MACO eCounties. This site has been so useful in finding marriages that took place before or after the database that Ancestry.com covers for MN. I've had two big finds so far using this. One on my side and one on my husbands.
There were stories in the family that my great-grandfather William LeFavor re-married after my great-grandmother Ann died in 1933. Doing a search did indeed turn up another marriage! I sent away & very promptly received a copy of the marriage. William married Maud Ann Moore (b. 9 Dec 1914 MN) on 21 Oct 1934 in East Grand Forks, Polk, MN. They were married by Rev. Daniel James Kerr, witnesses: Mrs. D. J. Kerr & Dr. L. E. Doringan. Unfortunately I haven't been able to find anything more on Maud. I'm hoping when the 1940 census comes out next year, I'll be able to do some more tracking on them.
On my husband's side, he had heard that his father's father's surname was Anderson. This has been a hard thing to really verify as his grandmother died some years ago, and his father isn't listed in Ancestry's birth index as his parents were not married. Wouldn't you know that doing a search for Portlance turned up a record for his grandma & a Michael Anderson? I sent for this record but was sent an email back saying no marriage record existed but perhaps a marriage license which the recorder could send me. So as it turns out Arlene Elizabeth (Kerr) Portlance, aged 26 and Michael Frank Anderson, aged 21, filed for a marriage license on 29 Sep 1960 in Hennepin County. The month after my husband's father was born. But according to the county recorder, they either never married or did it in another state. I'm guessing they never married. But I never would have gotten this clue without the website.
There were stories in the family that my great-grandfather William LeFavor re-married after my great-grandmother Ann died in 1933. Doing a search did indeed turn up another marriage! I sent away & very promptly received a copy of the marriage. William married Maud Ann Moore (b. 9 Dec 1914 MN) on 21 Oct 1934 in East Grand Forks, Polk, MN. They were married by Rev. Daniel James Kerr, witnesses: Mrs. D. J. Kerr & Dr. L. E. Doringan. Unfortunately I haven't been able to find anything more on Maud. I'm hoping when the 1940 census comes out next year, I'll be able to do some more tracking on them.
On my husband's side, he had heard that his father's father's surname was Anderson. This has been a hard thing to really verify as his grandmother died some years ago, and his father isn't listed in Ancestry's birth index as his parents were not married. Wouldn't you know that doing a search for Portlance turned up a record for his grandma & a Michael Anderson? I sent for this record but was sent an email back saying no marriage record existed but perhaps a marriage license which the recorder could send me. So as it turns out Arlene Elizabeth (Kerr) Portlance, aged 26 and Michael Frank Anderson, aged 21, filed for a marriage license on 29 Sep 1960 in Hennepin County. The month after my husband's father was born. But according to the county recorder, they either never married or did it in another state. I'm guessing they never married. But I never would have gotten this clue without the website.
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
Off Hiatus
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)